Skip to content
CloseWeaveAI

Product & engineering

Ship faster, with quality you can measure.

Coding assistants help one engineer at a time. Operational AI works across the team: triaging issues, investigating bugs, writing tests and keeping documentation true, with engineers in charge of what ships.

At a glance

Enterprise customers report that exports fail for large accounts.

Deployed AI

A day or more

Engineers do every step

Operational AI

Engineers spend their time on review and design

AI runs triage and first fixes; engineers decide what ships

See all three ways

Illustration

What matters

What product and engineering teams are judged on.

  • Lead time

    From idea to production in days, not sprints.

  • Quality and reliability

    Fewer incidents, and faster recovery from the ones that happen.

  • Engineering focus

    Less time on triage, toil and documentation.

  • Security

    Changes checked for risk before they merge.

Walkthrough

The same request, three ways.

Switch between deployed, specialised and operational AI to see who does the work, how long it takes and what keeps it safe.
closeweave.ai/product-and-engineering/walkthroughIllustration

The request

TicketCustomer support

BUG-4127: export fails for large accounts

CSV export times out above 200,000 rows.

Three enterprise customers affected.

Show it handled by

Autonomy level 1

Deployed AI

A chat assistant. Someone asks, it answers, people do the rest.

  1. A person types

    Why might a CSV export fail for large datasets?

  2. AI replies

    Common causes include timeouts, memory limits and pagination issues. Consider streaming the export or running it as a background job.

  3. Person

    Engineer. Reproduces the bug, finds the cause, writes the fix and the tests, and updates the ticket.

3 steps · one to a person · a day or more

How long
A day or more
Who does the work
Engineers do every step
What keeps it safe
None: general advice, not your code
What goes to people
Everything

Autonomy level 2

Specialised AI

It works from your data and tools and prepares the work. A person approves.

  1. Trigger

    BUG-4127 is filed in the issue tracker.

  2. Tools
    logs.search("export", errors, 7 days, redacted) · repo.search("exportCsv") · tests.run("exports")

    Returned: Timeouts after 30 seconds above 200,000 rows. The export loads every row into memory.

  3. AI replies

    Proposed change: stream rows in batches. Tests added for small, large and very large accounts.

  4. Person

    Engineer. Reviews the change and merges it.

    Approved
  5. Action

    Released behind a feature flag for the three customers first, with a one-click rollback.

5 steps · one to a person · about an hour of an engineer's time

How long
About an hour of an engineer's time
Who does the work
AI investigates and drafts; engineers review
What keeps it safe
Every change reviewed and tested
What goes to people
Every change

Autonomy level 3

Operational AI

It runs the process within set limits, logs every step and hands people the exceptions.

  1. Trigger

    Every new issue and every failed check.

  2. Rule

    Classify, reproduce and propose fixes, with no write access to production.

    Logs are redacted before the AI sees them. Nothing merges without passing tests and an engineer's review.

  3. Action

    Duplicates merged, owners assigned, the fix and its tests proposed, documentation updated.

  4. Person

    Exception: goes to a person

    Tech lead. The fix changes how customer data is exported, so it goes to the tech lead for a data and security review.

    Escalated
  5. Record

    [14:22]Proposal, review and release linked to the issue.

  6. Report

    Weekly: lead time, change failure rate, issues by cause, and toil removed.

6 steps · one to a person · engineers spend their time on review and design

How long
Engineers spend their time on review and design
Who does the work
AI runs triage and first fixes; engineers decide what ships
What keeps it safe
Review gate, test gate, feature flags
What goes to people
Every merge; security and data changes

Controls

Owner
Head of engineering
Measure
Lead time and change failure rate
Limit
No production access; review required
Log
Every proposal linked to its issue
Fallback
Issues queue for the team
Stop
Turn off AI proposals in one switch

Illustrative: names, figures and timings are invented.

Illustration: Enterprise customers report that exports fail for large accounts. Shown three ways: Deployed AI, Specialised AI, Operational AI.

Where to start

Processes that pay back first.

Each at the autonomy level we recommend. Starting points, not case studies: we confirm each one with your numbers.
  • 3Run with exceptions

    Issue triage and duplicates

    Owners assigned automatically.

  • 2Automate with approval

    Tests for new changes

    Engineers review each one.

  • 2Automate with approval

    Code review for risk and style

    A second reviewer, never the only one.

  • 3Run with exceptions

    Documentation kept current

    Updated from merged changes.

  • 3Run with exceptions

    Incident summaries

    Timelines drafted from the logs.

  • 1Assist

    Architecture decisions

    AI researches options; engineers choose.

What we build and run

Built in your systems, run with your team.

  • Triage and routing across your issue tracker
  • Review and test agents in your pipeline
  • Documentation that stays true
  • Measurement of delivery and quality

What we measure

Numbers you already track.

  • Lead time for changes
  • Change failure rate
  • Time to restore service
  • Hours of toil removed
  • Test coverage of new code

The Academy

Learn to run it yourselves: the Product & engineering track.

Ship with AI in the workflow and keep quality measurable.

Being built

Start with one product and engineering process.

We map the work, pick the process that pays back first, and run it with your team.